Which of the following is a remedy for enforcing an easement?

Enjoining the use of an easement is a valid remedy for enforcing the rights associated with that easement. This legal action involves a court ordering a party to refrain from using the easement in a manner that violates the rights of the easement holder. If the dominant estate owner (the holder of the easement) is wrongfully denied access or if the servient estate owner (the one who owns the land over which the easement runs) is using the easement inappropriately, seeking an injunction can effectively enforce the easement's intended use.

This remedy is particularly important because it seeks to maintain the status quo and protect the rights of the easement holder, ensuring that they can utilize the easement as agreed upon without interference. In contrast, options that involve terminating the easement or refunding fees relate to different aspects of easement management but do not directly address enforcing its current use. Similarly, transferring the easement to another party does not contribute to enforcing rights related to its current use, which is the focus of the question.