Which factor does NOT contribute to a claim of adverse possession?

A claim of adverse possession requires certain criteria to be met for an individual to gain legal ownership of a property after occupying it for a specified period. Among these criteria, continuous use, use without permission, and open and notorious possession are key factors.

Continuous use implies that the individual claiming adverse possession has maintained consistent and uninterrupted occupancy of the property for the entire statutory period. This shows a stable claim to the land.

Use without permission is crucial because it indicates that the claimant does not have the consent of the true owner, reinforcing the idea that the possession is adverse to the owner's rights.

Open and notorious possession means that the occupation of the property is obvious and evident to anyone, including the true owner, which prevents the occupant from hiding their use of the land. This visibility is essential; it puts the true owner on notice that someone is asserting a claim over the property.

The factor mentioned regarding possession being detrimental to the true owner does not form a necessary basis for establishing a claim of adverse possession. While it may be a byproduct of the adverse possession, it is not a specific requirement that strengthens the legal claim. Adverse possession focuses more on the actions and intentions of the possessor rather than the impact of those actions on the true owner's situation.